Limle v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation Dkt. 28 of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Att orney's Fees Dkt. 25 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $7,537.46, to be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel, if Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/13/2018. (SMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TINA M. LIMLE, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:17-cv-273-T-30MAP COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Dkt. 28). The Court notes that neither party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has elapsed. After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 28) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. 2. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,537.46, to be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, if Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 13th day of April, 2018. Copies Furnished To: Counsel/Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?