Limle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
29
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation Dkt. 28 of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Att orney's Fees Dkt. 25 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $7,537.46, to be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel, if Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/13/2018. (SMB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
TINA M. LIMLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:17-cv-273-T-30MAP
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation
submitted by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Dkt. 28). The Court notes that neither party
filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such
objections has elapsed.
After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the
opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be adopted,
confirmed, and approved in all respects.
ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 28) of the Magistrate Judge is
adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this
order for all purposes, including appellate review.
2.
Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED.
3.
Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,537.46, to be
paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, if Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the
Government.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 13th day of April, 2018.
Copies Furnished To:
Counsel/Parties of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?