Davis v. Kelsey et al
Filing
7
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 6 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's construed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/23/2017. (BGS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
GRADY DAVIS, JR. ,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:17-cv-1288-T-36AAS
DAVID KELSEY, HUGUES MATHE and
CLARENCE MITCHELL,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation, filed by
Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on August 2, 2017 (Doc. 6). In the Report and
Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Sansone recommends that Plaintiff’s construed motion for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) be DENIED and this case be DISMISSED. All parties
were furnished copies of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded the opportunity to
file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed.
Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon this Court's independent
examination of the file, it is determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 6) is adopted,
confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all
purposes, including appellate review.
(2)
Plaintiff’s construed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is
DENIED.
(3)
This case is DISMISSED.
(4)
The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on August 23, 2017.
Copies to:
The Honorable Amanda Arnold Sansone
Counsel of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?