United States of America v. Francati
Filing
9
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 8 is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Defendant in the amount of $11,450.45. This judgment shall accrue post-judgment interest at the legal rate until paid in full. This case is CLOSED and all pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/22/2017. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:17-cv-01427-JSM-AAS
MICHAEL FRANCATI,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Default
Judgment. (Dkt. 8). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the Motion.
A defendant who defaults is deemed to have admitted all well-pleaded allegations
of fact in a complaint. See Nishimatsu Const. Co. v. Houston Nat. Bank, 515 F.2d 1200,
1206 (5th Cir. 1975). As a result, a court may enter a default judgment against a party who
has failed to respond to a complaint, assuming the complaint provides a sufficient basis for
the judgment entered. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55; Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace Foundation, 789 F.3d
1239, 1245 (11th Cir. 2015) (internal citation omitted).
On June 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendant Michael Francati.
(Dkt. 1). The Complaint contained a single count for failure to pay pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1345. Id. In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant owes debt to the United
States. Id. Plaintiff attached a Certificates of Indebtedness, certifying the amount of
Defendant’s debt according to U.S. Department of Education’s records. Id. at Exh. 2. As
of May 4, 2017, the debt consisted of $4,920.42 in principal and $6,440.03 in accrued
interest, for a total of $11,360.45. Id.
Plaintiff effected service of process on Defendant on August 16, 2017. (Dkt. 5).
Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading. On September 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed a
motion for Clerk's default. (Dkt. 6). The Clerk entered a default as to Defendant pursuant
to Rule 55(a) on September 18, 2017. (Dkt. 7). Thereafter, Plaintiff filed its Motion for
Entry of Default Judgment and attachments, including an invoice demonstrating that it
incurred $90 in costs to serve Defendant. (Dkt. 8-3, 8-4).
Based upon the Clerk’s entry of default, the well-pled factual allegations contained
in the Complaint, the Certificates of Indebtedness, Plaintiff’s motion, and the invoice, the
Court determines that Plaintiff’s motion should be granted. Plaintiff is entitled to a
judgment against Defendant in the amount of $11,450.45, consisting of $11,360.45 in
student loan debt and $90 in costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1921.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Dkt. 8) is granted.
2.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Defendant in the amount of
$11,450.45. This judgment shall accrue post-judgment interest at the legal
rate until paid in full.
3.
This case is CLOSED and all pending motions are denied as moot.
2
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on September 22, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?