Woodson v. Russo et al

Filing 5

ORDER overruling 4 --objections; adopting 3 --REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 2 --motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing the action; directing the clerk to RETURN to the plaintiff the miscellaneous box of papers and to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 7/21/2017. (BK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JERRY WOODSON, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:17-cv-1495-T-23AEP RONALD RUSSO, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER The plaintiff alleges: For four years [and] six months, the plaintiff, Jerry Woodson was illegally profiled by the unknown agents of the Office of Agriculture Law Enforcement, by Mental Abuse, Kidnapping and Torture. Emotional/Psychological Abuse causes emotional pain, distress or anguish. The plaintiff received verbal assault, intimidation, threats, insults, harassment and treat from the defendant (unknown agents) twenty four hours a day. Two agents abused the Plaintiff 12 hours per shift. The plaintiff was Sexual Abused as he prepared for bedtime. In the form of abuse to the rectum with cold laser to the nerves in and around the rectum area to make the Plaintiff homosexual. (Doc. 1 at 2) Magistrate Judge Porcelli, who recommends denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the action as frivolous, correctly observes that the complaint appears “baseless, delusional, and without an arguable basis either in fact or law.” (Doc. 3 at 3) Because the plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 4) fails to suggest any merit in the plaintiff’s complaint, the objection (Doc. 4) is OVERRULED, the report and recommendation (Doc. 3) is ADOPTED, the motion (Doc. 2) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and the action is DISMISSED. The clerk is directed to return to the plaintiff the “miscellaneous box of papers” and to close the case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on July 21, 2017. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?