Woodson v. Russo et al
Filing
5
ORDER overruling 4 --objections; adopting 3 --REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 2 --motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing the action; directing the clerk to RETURN to the plaintiff the miscellaneous box of papers and to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 7/21/2017. (BK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
JERRY WOODSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 8:17-cv-1495-T-23AEP
RONALD RUSSO, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
ORDER
The plaintiff alleges:
For four years [and] six months, the plaintiff, Jerry Woodson was
illegally profiled by the unknown agents of the Office of Agriculture
Law Enforcement, by Mental Abuse, Kidnapping and Torture.
Emotional/Psychological Abuse causes emotional pain, distress or
anguish. The plaintiff received verbal assault, intimidation, threats,
insults, harassment and treat from the defendant (unknown agents)
twenty four hours a day. Two agents abused the Plaintiff 12 hours per
shift.
The plaintiff was Sexual Abused as he prepared for bedtime. In the
form of abuse to the rectum with cold laser to the nerves in and around
the rectum area to make the Plaintiff homosexual.
(Doc. 1 at 2) Magistrate Judge Porcelli, who recommends denying leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismissing the action as frivolous, correctly observes that the
complaint appears “baseless, delusional, and without an arguable basis either in fact
or law.” (Doc. 3 at 3) Because the plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 4) fails to suggest any
merit in the plaintiff’s complaint, the objection (Doc. 4) is OVERRULED, the report
and recommendation (Doc. 3) is ADOPTED, the motion (Doc. 2) for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and the action is DISMISSED. The clerk is
directed to return to the plaintiff the “miscellaneous box of papers” and to close the
case.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on July 21, 2017.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?