Secret et al v. Roe et al
Filing
13
ORDER: Plaintiff Jeanette Braxton Secret's Motion for Referral to Arbitration (Doc. # 12 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as prematurely asserted. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/25/2017. (KAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
JEANETTE BRAXTON SECRET, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 8:17-cv-1830-T-33TBM
v.
PHIL ROE, ET AL.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to pro se
Plaintiff Jeanette Braxton Secret’s Motion for Referral to
Arbitration (Doc. # 12), which was filed on August 21, 2017.
As explained below, the Court denies the Motion without
prejudice as prematurely asserted.
Discussion
Plaintiffs
Jeanette
Braxton
Secret,
Carmen
Braxton,
Jeanette Braxton Secret Family Trust, and Andrew K. Jones
Family Trust initiated this action on July 31, 2017, naming
the following Defendants: (1) Phil Roe, MD, Chairman, House
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs; (2) Johnny Isakson, Majority
Senate
Committee
on
Veterans’
Affairs;
(3)
Jon
Tester,
Minority Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs; (4) David J.
Shulkin,
Secretary
of
Veterans
Affairs;
(5)
Catherine
Mitrano, District Chief Counsel; (6) Kathy Simpson, Deputy
Chief Counsel; (7) E. Douglas Bradshaw, Chief Counsel, Torts
Law Group; (8) Dr. Abu T. Siddigui, MD, Staff Physician and
Attending Physician; (9) Dr. Abelardo Augustines, Primary
Care Doctor; (10) Anuja Pradhan, MD, Hematology/Oncology;
(11) Sonia A Cotton, Radiology Nurse; (12) Mr. Robinson Ang,
Physical Therapist; (13) David M. Crowder, RN; (14) Lawrence
Matthews, 5B Nurses Station; (15) Dr. McDonald, MD, Lung
Doctor; (16) Mr. Ariel Rodriguez, Chief, Patient Advocate;
(17)
Ronald
Watts,
5th
Gathright,
District-
Patient
Orlando
Advocate;
VAMCA;
and
(18)
Terrence
(19)
Tatishka
Musgrove, VAMC, Bay Pines Pines VAHCS.
The pro se Complaint provides an account of the death
of Andrew Kirk Jones, a 79-year old veteran, at the Bay
Pines VA Hospital, located in Hillsborough County, Florida.
Plaintiffs label the Complaint as a “Complaint for a Civil
Case
Alleging
including
but
Negligence”
not
and
limited
array
to,
a
medical
host
of
claims,
malpractice
and
wrongful death.
Plaintiffs
accompanied
with
an
Application to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. # 2).
The
-2-
the
Complaint
Magistrate Judge examined the Complaint and the Application
to
proceed
in
forma
pauperis
and
filed
a
Report
and
Recommendation on August 11, 2017, recommending denial of
the
Application
prejudice.
for
(Doc.
in
#
7).
forma
pauperis
The
status
Magistrate
without
Judge
also
recommended dismissal of the Complaint with the opportunity
to file an Amended Complaint. (Id.).
The deadline for
Plaintiffs to object to the Report and Recommendation has
not
yet
expired
and
the
Report
and
Recommendation
is
currently pending.
On August 19, 2017, Jeanette Braxton Secret sent an
email communication to this Court requesting that the Court
schedule an arbitration proceeding.1
The Court notes that
Secret has also filed the email communication on the record.
(Doc. # 9).
In addition, Secret has filed a separate Motion
requesting that an arbitration be scheduled. (Doc. # 12).
The Court takes the opportunity to explain to all pro
se
Plaintiffs
that
they
should
not
send
any
email
communications to the undersigned, and they should not make
any requests for relief in emails or letters to the Court.
1
She also indicates that if her Application to proceed in
forma pauperis is ultimately denied, she will “consider paying
the $400" filing fee for civil cases. (Doc. # 9 at 1).
-3-
As explained in Local Rule 3.01(f), “All applications to the
Court (i) requesting relief in any form, or (ii) citing
authorities
or
presenting
argument
with
respect
to
any
matter awaiting decision, shall be made in writing . . . in
accordance with this rule and in appropriate form pursuant
to Rule 1.05; and . . . shall not be addressed or presented
to the Court in the form of a letter or the like.
All
pleadings and papers to be filed shall be filed with the
Clerk of the Court and not with the judge thereof.”
The
Court granted Plaintiff Jeanette Braxton Secret permission
to e-file, and she should carefully examine the Local Rules
and file any Motions with the Court using cm/ecf.
With
respect
to
Plaintiff’s
specific
request
for
referral to arbitration, the Court denies the Motion as
prematurely asserted.
This matter is in its infancy.
The
case is at the Complaint stage and such preliminary matters
as the filing fee (or waiver thereof) are currently being
considered.
At a later juncture, the Court may determine
that alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation or
arbitration,
is
appropriate
circumstances of this case.
under
the
particular
However, due to the present
procedural status of the case, the Court denies the Motion
-4-
for Arbitration.
Plaintiff is free to re-raise her request
for arbitration at a later juncture.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
Plaintiff Jeanette Braxton Secret’s Motion for Referral
to Arbitration (Doc. # 12) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as
prematurely asserted.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this
25th day of August, 2017.
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?