Rosello v. Tower Imaging, Inc. et al
ORDER ATTACHED denying 26 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement; and denying 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 10/12/2017. (CCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ROLAND A. ROSELLO, d/b/a
ROLAND A. ROSELLO, P.L.,
CASE NO. 8:17-cv-1884-T-26TBM
TOWER IMAGING, INC., f/k/a TOWER
IMAGING, INC., d/b/a COMMUNITY
DIAGNOSTIC CENTER OF BRANDON, and
COLLECTIONS DIVISION, INC.,
UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the well-pleaded
allegations of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which this Court must accept as true
at this early juncture of the proceedings and must construe in the light most favorable to
Plaintiff,1 it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint or Alternative Motions for More Definite
Statement (Dkts. 26 & 27) are denied. In the Court’s view, those allegations state claims
See Bishop v. Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A., 817 F. 3d 1268, 1270 (11th Cir. 2016).
for relief plausible on their face against both Defendants for violating the federal Fair
Debt Collections Practice Act and the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act.2
Defendants shall file their answer and defenses to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint
within fourteen (14) days of this order.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on October 12, 2017.
s/Richard A. Lazzara
RICHARD A. LAZZARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO:
Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?