MANDELBAUM et al v. DISANTO

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING 30 chief magistrate judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION dated 5/5/2017. The chief magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Plaintiff's r equest to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§§ 1391(b)(2) and 1404(a) (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division for all further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 8/8/2017. (alb) [Transferred from flnd on 8/10/2017.]

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION EDWARD MANDELBAUM and BARRY RELL, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No: 3:14cv461/RV/EMT PATRICK DISANTO, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated May 5, 2017 (ECF No. 30). Plaintiffs’ have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Page 2 of 2 2. Plaintiffs’ request to transfer venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)(2) and 1404(a) (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, for all further proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2017. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:14cv461/RV/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?