Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Wilkins et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default Against Defendants Javon Melton and Lachadrick Reese. The Clerk is directed to enter defaults against Defendants Javon Melton, as the mother of Defendant J.R., a minor, and Lachadrick Reese. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 10/25/2017. (LBL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:17-cv-1918-T-27JSS CAMILLE M. WILKINS, LACHADRICK REESE, and JAVON MELTON, as mother and natural guardian of J.R., a minor, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default Against Defendants Javon Melton and Lachadrick Reese (“Motion”). (Dkt. 11.) In this interpleader action, Plaintiff requests a determination of the proper disposition of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) account of its former employee, who is deceased (“Decedent”). (Dkt. 1.) Defendant Camille Wilkins, who has answered the Complaint (Dkt. 10), is Decedent’s surviving spouse, Defendant Lachadrick Reese is Decedent’s adult child, and J.R. is Decedent’s minor child. (Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 16, 24.) Defendants assert interests in Decedent’s ESOP account.1 In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks entry of Clerk’s defaults as to Javon Melton, who is J.R.’s mother, and Lachadrick Reese. On August 30, 2017, Plaintiff filed proof of service as to Ms. Melton and Mr. Reese, stating that they were served on August 19, 2017. (Dkt. 6.) As to Mr. Reese, the server avers that service was performed on him via substitute service by leaving the summons and complaint with Ms. Melton, who is identified on the Verified Return of Service as “MOTHER / CO-RESIDENT.” (Id. at 3.) Mr. Reese has been properly served, see Fed. R. Civ. 1 J.R., a minor, asserts an interest through his mother, Defendant Javon Melton. (Dkt. 1 ¶ 24.) P. 4(e)(2)(B), and entry of a Clerk’s default as to him is therefore proper, see id. at 12(a)(1)(A)(i), 55(a). As to Ms. Melton, who brings this action on behalf of her minor child, “[a] minor or an incompetent person in a judicial district of the United States must be served by following state law for serving a summons or like process on such a defendant in an action brought in the courts of general jurisdiction of the state where service is made.” Id. at 4(g). Under Florida law, minors are served “[b]y serving a parent or guardian of the minor as provided for in s[ection] 48.031.” § 48.041(1)(a), Fla. Stat. Florida Statutes § 48.031(1)(a) provides that “[s]ervice of original process is made by delivering a copy of it to the person to be served with a copy of the complaint, petition, or other initial pleading.” Id. § 48.031(1)(a). Because a copy of the summons and complaint were served on Ms. Melton personally (Dkt. 6 at 4), service was proper and entry of Clerk’s default against Ms. Melton is proper. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i), 55(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default Against Defendants Javon Melton and Lachadrick Reese (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter defaults against Defendants Javon Melton, as the mother of Defendant J.R., a minor, and Lachadrick Reese. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 25, 2017. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?