Lanzi v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA et al
Filing
44
ORDER re 40 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, 41 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, 38 MOTION to Compel Discovery Against Defendants filed by Josee Lanzi. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 2/5/2019. (VIV)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
JOSEE LANZI,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:17-cv-2020-T-36AEP
YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION,
USA, YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & YAMAHA
MOTOR CO., LTD.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc.
38) and Defendant’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 41). For the reasons stated at the hearing, it
is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant must supplement its response to Plaintiff’s Request
for Production No. 12 and disclose the following:
1. The PWC owner’s name, email, and telephone numbers (collectively “identifying
information”) in accordance with the confidentiality agreement between the parties.
Any identifying information shall not be disclosed to anyone beyond the purposes
of this instant case. If any identifying information is to be utilized in any documents
that may become public, the parties shall agree upon a methodology to limit the
disclosure of any identifying information.
2. The identification number for the unit that is the subject of the service request (PID).
3. The hull identification numbers (HIN) for the unit that is the subject of the service
request;
4. The dealer and/or dealer representative/employees involved with the customer
complaint and/or service and/or trade-in of the subject PWCs.
5. These disclosures must all be made by 12:00 P.M. on February 7, 2019.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 5th day of February, 2019.
cc: Counsel of record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?