Zenteno et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filing
84
ORDER granting 66 Motion to Strike Jury Trial Demand in accord with the attached order. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/15/2019. (CCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
PABLO A. ZENTENO and
MARIA J. ZENTENO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CASE NO. 8:17-cv-2591-T-02TGW
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
Upon due consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Strike Jury Trial Demand
(Dkt. 66), Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. 73), and Defendant’s reply (Dkt. 79), the
Court concludes the motion should be granted.
The mortgage executed by Plaintiffs in favor of Defendant contains the
following jury waiver provision:
15. Jury Trial Waiver. The Borrower hereby waives
any right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim,
or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in
equity, arising out of or in any way related to this
Security Instrument or the Note.
Dkt. 66-1 at 15. Plaintiffs’ fraud claim falls within the scope of the waiver as any
claim “arising out of or in any way related to this” mortgage. See, e.g., Fleeger v.
Wachovia Bank, No. 5:12-cv-294-Oc-32PRL, 2013 WL 1760190, at *3 (M.D. Fla.
Apr. 24, 2013) and other cases cited in the motion (Dkt. 66 at 5). Plaintiffs have
failed to show that the waiver is anything other than knowing and voluntary. Nor
have they convinced this Court that Defendant waived its right to contest
the jury trial by waiting too long.1
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Strike Jury Trial Demand (Dkt. 66) is
granted. Plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial is hereby stricken. This case will
proceed to a bench trial set for the March 2020 trial term commencing March 2,
2020.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on July 15, 2019.
s/William F. Jung
WILLIAM F. JUNG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO:
Counsel of Record
1
Defendant objected to the jury demand when the parties filed their joint case
management report. Dkt. 42 at 2. By doing so, Defendant did not consent to a trial by
jury. Cf. Affiliati Network, Inc. v. Wanamaker, 1:16-cv-24097, 2017 WL 7311893, at *3
(S.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2017) (citing cases for proposition that signing case management
report containing jury trial election, without objection, amounts to consent); Roth v.
Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 2:15-cv-783-FtM-29MRM, 2016 WL 7473818, at *2 (M.D.
Fla. Dec. 29, 2016) (same). Moreover, Plaintiffs have not demonstrated how they will be
prejudiced. See Acciard v. Whitney, No. 2:07-cv-476-FtM-36DNF, 2011 WL 4902972
(M.D. Fla. Oct. 13, 2011) (granting motion to strike jury trial filed more than a year after
demand was made, and finding judicial economy promoted trying case before court).
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?