Belajonas v. Second Round Sub, LLC
Filing
7
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Peter J. Grilli, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than April 4, 2018. Lead Counsel shall file a noti ce of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by December 19, 2017. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lea d Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the he aring by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/5/2017. (JAM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
BELINDA BELAJONAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 8:17-cv-2859-T-33MAP
SECOND ROUND SUB, LLC,
Defendant.
______________________________/
FAST-TRACK SCHEDULING ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court
finds it necessary to implement a schedule tailored to meet
the particular circumstances of this case, which was brought
under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act, the Junk Fax Prevention Act, and/or
state law consumer protection statutes. Therefore, consistent
with
the
just,
speedy
and
inexpensive
administration
of
justice, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is:
ORDERED that the provisions of Rule 26(a)(1) and Local
Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B) and (d) concerning the initial disclosures
and filing of a Case Management Report are hereby waived in
this
case.
Instead,
the
parties
following schedule:
1
shall
comply
with
the
1.
No later than February 2, 2018, the parties shall
serve upon each other but not file with the Court copies of
the following:
A.
Plaintiff1
All documents in Plaintiff’s possession, custody, or
control that relate to the telephone calls, letters, or other
debt collection activities in question. This includes, but is
not limited to:
(1)
Telephone
records,
call
logs,
voice
recordings, and account notations pertaining to any telephone
calls Plaintiff contends were made by Defendant;
(2)
demonstrating
Documents
that
and/or
Plaintiff
other
was
in
relevant
evidence
possession
of
the
operative telephone at the time of the telephone calls in
question;
(3)
Documents
and/or
other
relevant
evidence
showing that (a) Plaintiff did not provide Defendant with
consent to make the telephone calls in question and/or (b)
documentation
that
Plaintiff
revoked
consent
prior
to
Defendant making the telephone calls;
If there is more than one plaintiff or defendant, the
singular reference to plaintiff or defendant shall include
the plural.
1
2
(4)
evidence
Any and all documents and/or other relevant
pertaining
to
Plaintiff’s
prior
complaints
to
Defendant regarding Defendant making the unwanted telephone
calls in question; and
(5)
All written correspondence, including court
documents, pertaining to Defendant's alleged debt collection
efforts.
Upon furnishing the information to Defendant, Plaintiff
shall file a Certificate of Compliance with the Court.
B.
Defendant
All documents in Defendant’s possession, custody, or
control that relate to the telephone calls letters, or other
debt collection activities in question. This includes, but is
not limited to:
(1)
recordings
Telephone
pertaining
records,
to
the
contends were made by Defendant,
call
telephone
logs,
calls
and
voice
Plaintiff
which includes any and all
notations made by Defendant's representative or employee
during the telephone call;
(2)
Documentation
that
Plaintiff
consented
to
Defendant making the telephone calls in question;
(3)
evidence
Any and all documents and/or other relevant
pertaining
to
Plaintiff’s
3
prior
complaints
to
Defendant regarding Defendant making the unwanted telephone
calls in question; and
(4)
All written correspondence, including court
documents, pertaining to Defendant's alleged debt collection
efforts.
Upon furnishing the information to Plaintiff, Defendant
shall file a Certificate of Compliance with the Court.
2.
STAYED,
Until further order of this Court, all discovery is
except
as
necessary
to
obtain
and
provide
the
information set forth in Paragraph 1. The Court permits
counsel to serve subpoenas on telecommunications entities so
that accurate information may be gathered in this case. If
the parties elect to serve subpoenas for telephone records in
this case, they should do so as early as practicable and
should work together to facilitate the process. Although the
filing of discovery is prohibited by the Local Rules, in the
instance that a subpoena is issued to a telecommunications
entity, that subpoena must be filed with the Court so that
the Court may monitor the facilitation of information in this
case. The parties are also directed to notify the Court when
the information requested in the subpoena is furnished.
3.
On
or
before
February
19,
2018,
Plaintiff
is
directed to file Answers to the Court’s Interrogatories.
4
Thereafter, by March 5, 2018, Defendant is directed to file
Answers to the Court’s Interrogatories. Those Interrogatories
are attached to this Order.
4.
This action is referred to mediation. The Court
appoints Peter J. Grilli, located at 3001 West Azeele Street,
Tampa, Florida 36609, (813) 874-1002, as mediator.
5.
The mediation shall be conducted as outlined in
this Order and Chapter Nine of the Local Rules.
6.
Scheduling Mediation: The parties must mediate no
later than
April 4, 2018.
However,
the parties are not
permitted to mediate until the information exchange outlined
in this Order, including answers to interrogatories, has been
completed.
7.
Rescheduling Mediation: If the mediation date is
approaching, and the parties realize they will not be able to
complete the document exchange and interrogatory answers
called for herein, the parties are directed to file a motion
to reschedule the mediation. In any event, once the mediation
has
been
scheduled,
the
parties
may
not
unilaterally
reschedule the mediation conference—a motion must be filed,
and leave of Court obtained, if they seek to reschedule the
mediation. In the motion to reschedule, counsel must include
the proposed date of rescheduling; the Court reserves the
5
right
to
deny
any
motion
that
seeks
to
reschedule
the
mediation conference for a date beyond the deadline set in
Paragraph 6. If the Court authorizes the parties to reschedule
the mediation conference, the parties may still be required
to pay the mediator’s cancellation fee. Thus, the parties are
strongly encouraged to promptly exchange documents and answer
interrogatories, as required herein, and to diligently adhere
to all deadlines to avoid unnecessary expense.
8.
Cancelling Mediation: Once the mediation conference
is set, neither party may cancel the mediation without first
obtaining leave of Court, even if the parties have reached a
settlement.
9.
Designation and Responsibility of Lead Counsel:
Tyler Bannon, Esq., is designated as Lead Counsel and must
consult both the mediator and other counsel to coordinate the
day and time of the mediation. By December 19, 2017, Lead
Counsel must file a notice of mediation that states the agreed
day and time of mediation. When the notice is filed, the
agreed
day
for
the
mediation
replaces
the
deadline
in
Paragraph (c). Extension of the mediation deadline requires
a Court order and is increasingly disfavored as the mediation
deadline approaches. Before moving for an extension of the
mediation deadline, the movant must consult both the mediator
6
and opposing counsel to determine an agreed day and time for
the rescheduled mediation. Under Local Rule 3.01(g), a motion
for an extension of the mediation deadline must certify that
the movant has conferred with opposing counsel and must state
whether counsel agrees to the resolution of the motion.
10.
General Rules Governing the Mediation: Although
mediation is governed by Chapter Nine of the Local Rules, the
following additional requirements apply:
(a)
Case Summary: At least five business days
before the scheduled mediation, each party must
email directly to the mediator and to opposing
counsel a brief written summary of the facts and
issues of the action. The mediator and the parties
must
treat
each
summary
as
a
confidential
communication and must not disclose the summary or
the summary’s content.
(b)
Authority of the Mediator: The mediator may
confer privately with any counsel, an individual
party, a corporate or municipal representative, or
a claims professional for any proper purpose in the
mediator’s discretion. The mediation must continue
until adjourned by the mediator. No participant may
compel the early conclusion of a mediation because
7
of travel or another engagement. Only the mediator
may declare an impasse or end the mediation. To
coordinate the mediation, the mediator may set an
abbreviated
scheduling
conference
before
the
that
all
mediation.
(c)
Attendance:
The
Court
directs
counsel, parties, corporate representatives, and
any other required claims professionals shall be
present
at
the
mediation
conference
with
full
authority to negotiate a settlement. Absent exigent
circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must
appear at the mediation conference; failure to
comply will result in the imposition of sanctions.
The Court does not allow mediation by telephone or
video conference.
Personal attendance is required.
See Local Rule 9.05(c).
(d) For cases in which statutory attorneys’ fees
may
be
claimed,
counsel
should
be
prepared
to
discuss reasonable attorneys’ fees and should have
that
information
in
hand
at
the
mediation
conference.
11.
Compensation of the Mediator: The parties must
compensate the mediator at the mediator’s prevailing hourly
8
rate, which, unless otherwise agreed by counsel, the parties
must bear equally and pay immediately after the mediation.
The parties must comply with the reasonable cancellation
policy established by the Mediator, which states:
When a case is cancelled or rescheduled with less
than fourteen (14) days notice, [the Mediator] will
bill all sides equally for the Minimum Charge for
the time reserved unless the parties have agreed
otherwise. Time of notice is computed as under Rule
6, Fed. R. Civ. P. [The Mediator does] not waive
cancellation/rescheduling
charges
unless
[the
Mediator is] able to book another case in the
reserved time slot. Cancellation or rescheduling
should be confirmed in writing (email or fax is
sufficient) to all parties. Please inform [the
Mediator] immediately of any motion which may
result in the re-scheduling of the mediation, or of
any negotiation which might make the mediation
unnecessary.
12.
Results of Mediation: Lead Counsel must file a
notice informing the Court of the results of the mediation
conference within twenty-four hours from the conclusion of
the mediation conference.
13.
Case Management Report and Additional Information:
In the event mediation does not result in settlement of this
action, the parties must conduct a case management meeting
immediately after the mediation conference, during which the
parties shall jointly prepare the attached fast-track case
management report. The parties shall file the completed fasttrack case management report within twenty-four hours of the
9
conclusion of the mediation conference. In addition, the
parties shall file a separate notice also within twenty-four
hours of the conclusion of the mediation conference informing
the Court of the legal issues they believe will need to be
resolved at the summary judgment stage and/or the factual
matters they believe will be at issue during trial.
14.
After
management
review
report,
the
of
the
Court
parties’
will
fast-track
determine
if
a
case
Case
Management Hearing is required. If a Case Management Hearing
is
required,
approximately
the
one
Court
week
will
after
conduct
the
such
parties’
hearing
mediation
conference. The Court will enter a notice indicating the
date and time of the hearing. Counsel are advised that this
case will be set for trial approximately 90-120 days after
the mediation conference. At the Case Management Hearing,
this Court will address any scheduling conflicts the parties
may have.
15.
Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court,
lead counsel must appear in person at the Case Management
Hearing. Lead Counsel must be prepared to discuss the claims
and defenses as well as any unique aspects of the case with
the Court. This hearing is an investment of the Court’s time
and presents an opportunity for counsel to meet the judge
10
presiding over their case, as well as present any issues that
should be called to the Court’s attention.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida on this
6th day of December, 2017.
Attachments:
Court’s Interrogatories
Magistrate Judge Consent Form
CMR form for Fast-Track Cases
11
COURT’S INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
(1) What kind of communications are at issue in this case?
Telephone calls placed to a land line, or to a cellular phone?
Letters
mailed
to
a
residence?
Facsimile
transmissions?
Please be as specific as possible.
(2) How many calls, letters, or other communications are at
issue? For instance, if you allege telephone calls were placed
in violation of the TCPA, how many calls were placed?
(3)
When did the communications at issue take place?
(4)
If telephone calls are at issue, do you allege that
Defendant used an automatic dialer?
(5) If telephone calls are at issue, do you allege that
Defendant utilized a live person or a recorded voice to
transmit the relevant information?
(6) If telephone calls are at issue, do you allege that the
calls were placed to a telephone that is registered in your
name? If not, to whom is the account registered?
(7) Do you have a prior business relationship with Defendant?
(8) Did you sign any document in which you consented to be
contacted by Defendant?
(9) Do you intend to pursue a class action?
12
_________________________________
(Plaintiff’s Signature)
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF __________________
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day,
personally appeared ________________________________, who
being first duly sworn, and ____ who is personally known to
me or ____ who produced _________ as identification,
deposes and says that he/she has read the foregoing Answers
to Interrogatories, knows the contents of same, and to the
best of his/her knowledge and belief, the same are true and
correct.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this _______ day
of_______, 20___.
NOTARY PUBLIC
______________________________
Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment
Notary Stamp
Print Name:
Title: Notary Public
Serial No. (if any):
Commission Expires:
13
COURT’S INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
(1) How many telephone calls, letters or other mailings, or
facsimiles do your records show as being made or sent during
the time period alleged by Plaintiff?
(2) If telephone calls are at issue, were the calls made by
an automatic dialer?
(3) If telephone calls are at issue, was a prerecorded voice
used?
(4) Did you ever receive documented prior consent to contact
Plaintiff?
(5)
Did you ever receive documented revocation of a consent
to contact Plaintiff?
(6) Before the Complaint was filed, were you ever placed on
notice that Plaintiff had retained counsel with respect to
the debt alleged to be at issue in the Complaint?
(7) What is your capacity with respect to the debt alleged to
be at issue in the Complaint? For example, are you the owner
of a note, a servicer, or both?
14
_________________________________
(Defendant’s Signature)
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF __________________
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day,
personally appeared ________________________________, who
being first duly sworn, and ____ who is personally known to
me or ____ who produced _________ as identification,
deposes and says that he/she has read the foregoing Answers
to Interrogatories, knows the contents of same, and to the
best of his/her knowledge and belief, the same are true and
correct.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this _______ day
of_______, 20___.
NOTARY PUBLIC
______________________________
Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment
Notary Stamp
Print Name:
Title: Notary Public
Serial No. (if any):
Commission Expires:
15
AO 85 (Rev. locally 5/99) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference B Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Middle District of Florida
_____________________________________,
Plaintiff(s)
v.
Case Number: ____________________________
_____________________________________,
Defendant(s)
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a United States
Magistrate Judge of this District Court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial, and to
order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge is, however, permitted only if all parties voluntarily
consent, as evidenced by execution of the Consent portion hereof, all together on this form, to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United
States Magistrate Judge.
You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent; but this will prevent the Court's jurisdiction from being
exercised by a Magistrate Judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent will not be
communicated to any Magistrate Judge or to the District Judge to whom the case has been assigned.
Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit, in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this District Court.
CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, the parties in this case hereby voluntarily consent to
have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial; order the entry of a final
judgment; and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, as necessary.
Signatures
____________________________
Parties Represented
____________________________________________
Date Signed
____________________
____________________________
____________________________________________
____________________
____________________________
____________________________________________
____________________
ORDER OF REFERENCE
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be referred to Honorable, __________________________________, United States
Magistrate Judge, for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73,
and the foregoing consent of the parties.
_____________________
Date
________________________________________________________________
VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, United States District Judge
NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO CLERK OF COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE SIGNED ON
THIS FORM CONSENTING TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
16
United States District Court
Middle District of Florida
Tampa Division
__________________________________,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Case No. ______________________________
__________________________________,
Defendant(s).
______________________________________________/
CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT
TO BE USED FOR THE FOLLOWING CASES :
FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA);
TITLE III AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA);
FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT (FDCPA);
TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA);
FLORIDA CONSUMER COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT (FCCPA);
REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT (RESPA); AND
FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT (FCRA).
The parties have agreed on the following dates and discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)
and Local Rule 3.05(c):
DEADLINE OR EVENT
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement
Mandatory Initial Disclosures
Discovery Deadline
Dispositive Motions
Meeting In Person to Prepare Joint Final Pretrial Statement
Joint Final Pretrial Statement
[Including a Single Set of Jointly-Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, Voir Dire
Questions, Witness Lists, & Exhibit Lists with Objections on Approved Form (to be e-mailed
in Word format to chambers_flmd_covington@flmd.uscourts.gov)]
Final Pretrial Conference
[The Court will set a date]
Trial Term Begins
[Trial term must be 5 weeks after dispositive motions deadline (unless filing of such
motions is waived); district judge trial terms begin on the first Monday of each month; trials
before magistrate judges will be set on a date certain after consultation with the parties]
[90-120 days after mediation conference]
Estimated Length of Trial
[Number of trial days]
Jury / Non-Jury
17
AGREED DATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?