Vazzo et al v. City of Tampa, Florida

Filing 60

ORDER: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 52 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) Equality Florida's Motion to Intervene as Party Defendant 30 is DENIED. (3) Equality Florida is permitted to appear as amicus curiae. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/4/2018. (BGS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ROBERT L. VAZZO and DAVID H. PICKUP, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 8:17-cv-2896-T-36AAS CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, Defendant. / ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on March 15, 2018 (Doc. 52). In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Sansone recommends that Equality Florida’s Motion to Intervene as Party Defendant be denied and Equality Florida, instead, be permitted to appear as amicus curiae. All parties were furnished copies of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded the opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed. Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon this Court's independent examination of the file, it is determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 52) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) Equality Florida’s Motion to Intervene as Party Defendant (Doc. 30) is DENIED. (3) Equality Florida is permitted to appear as amicus curiae. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on April 4, 2018. Copies to: The Honorable Amanda Arnold Sansone Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?