Lopez-Ruiz v. Greystar NHMC a Kingsley Associates et al

Filing 12

ORDER overruling 11 --objections; adopting 10 --report and recommendation; denying 2 --motion to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing the complaint; directing the clerk to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 3/21/2018. (BK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION INDIRA DAYANNA LOPEZ-RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:18-cv-211-T-23AAS GREYSTAR NHMC A KINGSLEY ASSOCIATES, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER The magistrate judge recommends (Doc. 10) denying Indira Dayanna LopezRuiz’s motion (Doc. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis and recommends dismissing the complaint (Doc. 1) for failing to state a claim.* Lopez-Ruiz objects (Doc. 11) to the report and recommendation. A de novo review of the report and recommendation reveals that Lopez-Ruiz’s objections are meritless. Accordingly, Lopez-Ruiz’s objections (Doc. 11) are OVERRULED, and the report and recommendation (Doc. 10) is ADOPTED. For the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, Lopez-Ruiz’s complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. * A January 30, 2018 order (Doc. 3) holds that Lopez-Ruiz’s complaint (Doc. 1) violates the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and directs Lopez-Ruiz to “file an amended complaint that states a cognizable claim and complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” (Doc. 3 at 4) Lopez-Ruiz has failed to amend her complaint. Lopez-Ruiz’s motion (Doc. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The clerk is directed to close the case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on March 21, 2018. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?