United States of America v. Ciaravella
Filing
46
ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and Rehearing on Court's Status Conference Held November 25, 2019 43 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/13/2019. (LJB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:18-cv-353-T-36AEP
MARK W. CIARAVELLA,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration and
Rehearing on Court’s Status Conference Held November 25, 2019 (Doc. 43). In the Motion,
Defendant indicates that he was unable to telephonically appear at the Court’s status conference
because an international business center was unable to make arrangements for the call. Doc. 43 ¶
3.
The purpose of the status conference was to discuss possible dates for scheduling the trial
in this matter. Doc. 42. During the hearing, the Court directed Plaintiff to confer with Defendant
regarding available dates, whether the parties consented to scheduling the matter before the
magistrate judge, and whether this will be a bench trial or a jury trial. Id. The Plaintiff did so and
has advised the Court of the dates on which the parties are available for trial. Doc. 44. The Court
scheduled a Final Pretrial Conference for January 21, 2020 at 1:45 p.m. in Tampa Courtroom 13A
and set the case for trial during the February 2020 trial term. Doc. 45. Accordingly, Defendant’s
Motion for Reconsideration and Rehearing on Court’s Status Conference Held November 25, 2019
(Doc. 43) will be denied as moot.
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration and Rehearing on Court’s Status
Conference Held November 25, 2019 (Doc. 43) is DENIED as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 13, 2019.
Copies to:
Counsel of Record and Unrepresented Parties, if any
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?