Garback et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Filing
7
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case until such time as the Panel has dispositively ruled as to whether this case will be transferred to the consolidated multidistrict litigation. The parties shall immediately inform the Court when the Panel has made its final ruling. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/10/2018. (KAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
JEROME
GARBACK
GARBACK,
and
TERESA
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 8:18-cv-819-T-33AEP
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER STAYING CASE
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte.
notes
that
this
case
may
be
subject
to
The Court
transfer
for
multidistrict litigation in the United States District Court for
the District of Maryland: MDL 2775 (In re Smith & Nephew
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability
Litigation).
In the interest of judicial economy, this Court stays this
matter until such time as the Panel has dispositively ruled as
to whether this case will be transferred to the consolidated
multidistrict litigation.
In so staying this case, this Court
is mindful of its broad discretion over the manner in which it
manages the cases before it, Chrysler Int’l Corp. v. Chemaly,
280 F.3d 1358, 1360 (11th Cir. 2002), and finds that the stay is
reasonable.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
1.
The Clerk is directed to STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE
this case until such time as the Panel has dispositively
ruled as to whether this case will be transferred to the
consolidated multidistrict litigation.
2.
The parties shall immediately inform the Court when the
Panel has made its final ruling.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 10th
day of April, 2018.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?