Garback et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER: The Clerk is directed to STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case until such time as the Panel has dispositively ruled as to whether this case will be transferred to the consolidated multidistrict litigation. The parties shall immediately inform the Court when the Panel has made its final ruling. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/10/2018. (KAK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JEROME GARBACK GARBACK, and TERESA Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 8:18-cv-819-T-33AEP SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER STAYING CASE This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. notes that this case may be subject to The Court transfer for multidistrict litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland: MDL 2775 (In re Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation). In the interest of judicial economy, this Court stays this matter until such time as the Panel has dispositively ruled as to whether this case will be transferred to the consolidated multidistrict litigation. In so staying this case, this Court is mindful of its broad discretion over the manner in which it manages the cases before it, Chrysler Int’l Corp. v. Chemaly, 280 F.3d 1358, 1360 (11th Cir. 2002), and finds that the stay is reasonable. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 1. The Clerk is directed to STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case until such time as the Panel has dispositively ruled as to whether this case will be transferred to the consolidated multidistrict litigation. 2. The parties shall immediately inform the Court when the Panel has made its final ruling. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 10th day of April, 2018. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?