Sandoval v. U.S. Department of Education
Filing
14
ORDER denying as moot 12 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 13 Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 2/20/2019. (BEE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
RAMIRO SANDOVAL, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 8:18-cv-1133-T-36AAS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
ORDER
Defendant U.S. Department of Education moves to set aside a Clerk’s default
entered against it. (Doc. 13). Defendant’s request is unopposed. (Id. at p. 7).
Plaintiff Ramiro Sandoval, Jr., submitted his complaint against Defendant on
May 8, 2018, and a summons addressed to Defendant was issued the same day. (Docs.
1, 2). However, summonses have not been issued for the U.S. Attorney General or
the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)-(2). In
addition, Plaintiff’s Motion for Clerk’s Default and Motion for Entry of Final
Judgment lists an incorrect address for the U.S. Attorney’s Office. (See Docs. 9, 12).
Because of Defendant’s failure to plead or otherwise defend against Plaintiff’s
complaint, the Clerk entered a default under Rule 55(a). (Docs. 9, 10). Plaintiff then
moved for entry of final default judgment. (Doc. 12).
1
In addition to serving Defendant, Rule 4(i)(1)(A) requires service of process on
the U.S. Attorney for the district in which the suit is brought. Service may be by
personal delivery or by sending it “by registered or certified mail to the civil-process
clerk at the United States attorney's office.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A)(i)-i(ii). In
addition, Rule 4 also requires sending “a copy of each by registered or certified mail
to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
4(i)(1)(B). Although Plaintiff served Defendant, he has not served the U.S. Attorney
General or the U.S. Attorney in this district.
A court may set aside entry of a Clerk’s default for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P.
55(c). “Good cause” under Rule 55(c) is a liberal standard. Sherrard v. Macy’s Sys.
and Tech., Inc., 724 F. App’x 736, 738 (11th Cir. 2018) (quotation and citation
omitted); see also Jones v. Harell, 858 F.2d 667, 668–69 (11th Cir. 1988) (affirming
district court that concluded party made “a bare minimum showing” to justify relief
under Rule 55(c)). Setting aside the Clerk’s default does not prejudice the nondefaulting party because Plaintiff does not oppose this relief. The court is satisfied
good cause exists to set aside the Clerk’s default against Defendant.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
(1)
Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Default (Doc. 13) is GRANTED.
Defendant must respond to Plaintiff’s complaint by March 12, 2019.
(2)
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 12) is DENIED AS
MOOT.
2
ENTERED in Tampa, Florida on February 20, 2019.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?