Yang v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 6

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 4 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 11/17/2020. (BGS)

Download PDF
Case 8:20-cv-02440-CEH-TGW Document 6 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION HONG CHANG YANG, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:20-cv-2440-T-36TGW CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and WILLIAM BARR, U.S. Attorney General, Defendants. / ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on October 30, 2020 (Doc. 4). In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Wilson recommends that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded the opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed. Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon this Court’s independent examination of the file, it is determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 4) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED, with prejudice. (3) The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file. Case 8:20-cv-02440-CEH-TGW Document 6 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 49 DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on November 17, 2020. Copies to: The Honorable Thomas G. Wilson Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?