Yang v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
6
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge #4 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 11/17/2020. (BGS)
Case 8:20-cv-02440-CEH-TGW Document 6 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
HONG CHANG YANG,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:20-cv-2440-T-36TGW
CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of
Department of Homeland Security and
WILLIAM BARR, U.S. Attorney General,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by
Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on October 30, 2020 (Doc. 4).
In the Report and
Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Wilson recommends that the complaint be dismissed with
prejudice. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded the
opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed.
Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon this Court’s independent
examination of the file, it is determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 4) is adopted,
confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all
purposes, including appellate review.
(2)
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED, with prejudice.
(3)
The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file.
Case 8:20-cv-02440-CEH-TGW Document 6 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 49
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on November 17, 2020.
Copies to:
The Honorable Thomas G. Wilson
Counsel of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?