Tollison v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment With Remand; Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt on 1/3/2025. (KAW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ANTHONY TOLLISON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:24-cv-1371-JRK CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. No. 24; “Motion”), filed December 19, 2024, that seeks to have this matter reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings. Motion at 1. Such a disposition is clearly within the Court’s authority. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED. Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on November 30, 2024. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is substituted as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment REVERSING AND REMANDING this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with the following instructions: On remand, the Appeals Council will take any further action needed to complete the administrative record and issue a new decision. Plaintiff will be provided an opportunity for a hearing. 3. The Clerk is further directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on January 3, 2025. kaw Copies: Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?