GANDOLFF v. BY THE PLANET, INC.

Filing 75

ORDER denying 72 Motion for Ruling on the Issues Stated in the Court's Order Dated December 12, 2008 by JOSEPH ALBERT GANDOLFF; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 5/14/09. (tss)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION JOSEPH ALBERT GANDOLFF, Plaintiff, v. BY THE PLANET, INC., Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Doc. 72, Motion for Ruling on the Issues Stated in the Court's Order Dated December 12, 2008, filed by the plaintiff, Joseph Albert Gandolff. On December 12, 2008, the Court entered an order (Doc. 62) denying Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. In that order, the Court noted that Plaintiff's civil contempt motion (Doc. 33) was still pending and that the Court had entered no other final or interlocutory order that could be appealed. Rather, the Court adjourned the hearing on Plaintiff's motion to hold the defendant corporation or its president, Mr. Anthony Michael McKnight, in contempt, because the defendant corporation was not represented by an attorney and because there was some dispute regarding Mr. McKnight's status as a registered agent for the now-dissolved corporation. Before the Court could take any steps to resolve those issues, Plaintiff filed his notice of appeal. In the instant motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court rule on those issues. As this matter is CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00108-MP-AK Page 2 of 2 currently on appeal before the Eleventh Circuit, this Court is without jurisdiction to proceed. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The motion at Doc. 72 is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of May, 2009 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 1:06-cv-00108-MP-AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?