HERSTGAARD v. CHERRYDEN LLC et al

Filing 94

ORDER re 93 Amended MOTION to Dismiss AS A Sanction For Failure To Comply With Court's Order filed by CHERRYDEN LLC. Plaintiff shall file response by 9/23/2009. Defendant, if necessary and appropriate, file a reply b y 10/14/2009. The Clerk is DIRECTED (1) to e-mail this order to Plaintiff after it is filed, (2) to make a contemporaneous docket entry reflecting the sending of the e-mail, and (3) to mail a hard copy of the order to Plaintiff at her last known addr ess as reflected on the Courts official docket by priority mail, with delivery confirmation. (Delivery Confirmation Number: 7008 1140 0002 0659 0010.) (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 9/23/2009)., Replies due by 10/14/2009.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 9/2/2009. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KASSANDRA S. HERSTGAARD, Plaintiff, vs. CHERRYDEN, LLC, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Defendants' amended motion to dismiss. Doc. 93. This order sets the deadlines for Plaintiff to file her response thereto and allows Defendants an opportunity to file a reply. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: That no later than September 23, 2009, Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' amended motion to dismiss; That no later than October 14, 2009, Defendants may, if necessary and appropriate, file a reply to Plaintiff's response; That the Clerk is DIRECTED (1) to e-mail this order to Plaintiff after it is filed, (2) to make a contemporaneous docket entry reflecting the sending of the e-mail, and (3) to mail a hard copy of the order to Plaintiff at her last known address as reflected on the Court's official docket by priority mail, with delivery confirmation. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2009. CASE NO. 1:07CV02-MP/AK s/A.Kornblum ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?