BROOKS v. GAINESVILLE SALVATION ARMY, et al

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 5/27/2009. This case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2), and the Clerk is directed to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION RUFUS JAMES BROOKS, JR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE SALVATION ARMY, Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Doc. 30, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the complaint be dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2), and that the order adopting this report and recommendation direct the clerk of court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees that Plaintiff does not have the constitutional right to sleep in a cot provided by the Salvation Army. Thus, any claims based on denial of such a right are frivolous. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated herein. CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00042-MP-AK Page 2 of 2 2. This case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2), and the Clerk is directed to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of May, 2009 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 1:07-cv-00042-MP-AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?