Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 20 Report and Recommendation and 29 Report and Recommendation; DENYING 15 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 21 Motion for FOR RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 6/03/2009. This matter is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION CLARENCE WALLESKE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES R MCDONOUGH, WALTER A MCNEIL, Respondents. ___________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on two Report and Recommendation's of the Magistrate Judge, Docs. 20 and 29. In the first, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion to dismiss this case as untimely filed be denied because only 311 days had passed that were not tolled by properly filed collateral attacks. With regard to this Report and Recommendation, the time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's analysis of the time that has accrued and that counts against the Petitioner's one year time limitation. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the matter will be remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. In the motion for restraining order, the Petitioner claims that prison officials have inappropriately seized his legal materials but he does not go so far as to claim that said seizure has affected his ability to litigate the instant matter, nor that he exhausted prison administrative CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00016-MP-AK Page 2 of 2 remedies. Accordingly, the Court agrees that he has an adequate remedy at law and denies the motion for restraining order. This matter is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2009 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 1:08-cv-00016-MP-AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?