GREEN v. MCCOLLUM et al

Filing 59

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 57 Report and Recommendation; DENYING 54 Motion for Hearing filed by DANNY A GREEN. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 8/25/2009. (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION DANNY A GREEN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P CERVONE, BILL MCCOLLUM, Respondents. _____________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Doc. 57, Report and Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, concerning Petitioner's Doc. 54 Motion for an Immediate Hearing. On January 7, 2009, this Court dismissed Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice, on the grounds that he had failed to exhaust state remedies. Petitioner has, since then, filed several motions, including this Motion for an Immediate Hearing. There is no indication, however, that Petitioner's state court post-conviction motions have concluded. Thus, Petitioner's state court remedies remain unexhausted. Once Petitioner has exhausted his available state remedies, he may file a new writ of habeas corpus in this Court. To the extent that Petitioner seeks injunctive relief based on his alleged continued lack of access to medical attention, he should raise those issues in the § 1983 action now pending, Case No. 4:09cv212-MMP/AK, as his medical condition lies at the heart of that proceeding. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Doc. 57, is adopted and CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00131-MP-AK Page 2 of 2 incorporated herein. 2. Petitioner's Motion for an Immediate Hearing, Doc. 54, is DENIED. 25th day of August, 2009 DONE AND ORDERED this s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 1:08-cv-00131-MP-AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?