GREEN v. MCNEIL

Filing 71

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accepting 67 Report and Recommendation except for statement that J.S. was a minor. 1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 68 Motion To Remove Strike is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 7/14/2011. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION DANNY ALLEN GREEN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00204-MP-GRJ WALTER A MCNEIL, Respondent. _____________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Doc. 67, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the petition of Mr. Green be denied. The plaintiff filed objections, Doc. 69, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection was made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court agrees that Mr. Green’s claim that the state information was deficient involves only state law and does not trigger federal constitutional review. Additionally, the Court agrees that Mr. Green did not exhaust the remain ten claims because he did not include them in his direct appeal although he should have. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and incorporated herein, except for the statement that J.S. was a minor. She was over eighteen at the time of the incident.1 The petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1, is DENIED, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The motion at Doc. 68 is also denied. DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2011 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge 1 Compare Doc. 34, Exh. C, p. 172, lines 11-12 (J.S.’s testimony at trial of her birth date) with Doc. 34, Exh. B, p. 1 (arrest report showing incident involving J.S. took place when she was 19). See also Green v. State, 951 So.2d 962 (Fla.App. 1 Dist.,2007).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?