Filing 9

ORDER finding as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RICKEY WHITE. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 12/17/2009. (jws)(Forms forwarded to Plaintiff per 4 Order.) Modified on 12/18/2009 to include forms to Plaintiff. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION RICKEY WHITE, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN BOUNDS, et al,, Defendants. / ORDER Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (doc. 5); Motion to Dismiss Five Judges (doc. 7); and Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff was previously ordered to amend his complaint and submit the proper inmate account information with a form motion for leave to proceed. (Doc. 4). None of the papers recently filed are on proper forms and the relief Plaintiff seeks, i.e. to delete five of the defendants named in his original complaint, will be achieved by filing an amended complaint. More than likely the order and the recently filed papers crossed in the mail, but out of an abundance of caution the Court herein directs the Clerk to resend the papers with the previous Order dated December 8, 2009. (Doc. 4). In light of this, the Motion to dismiss (doc. 7) is MOOT, and the motion for leave CASE NO. 1:09CV243-SPM/AK Page 2 of 2 to proceed IFP (doc. 8) is DENIED because it is not on the appropriate form nor accompanied by a signed inmate account form. DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of December, 2009. s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE No. 1:09cv243-spm/ak

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?