Filing 252

ORDER GRANTING 250 First MOTION to Set Aside Default filed by SPEED FRAMING INC. 218 Clerk's Entry of Default against SPEED FRAMING INC dated 5/5/2011 is SET ASIDE. SPEED FRAMING INC shall respond to LOWRY CONSTRUCTION & FRAMING INC's Fourth Party Complaint by 6/3/2011. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/31/2011. (Answer due by 6/3/2011.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/31/2011. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION THE BARTRAM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-254-SPM-GRJ C.B. CONTRACTORS, LLC, and CAMBRIDGE BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, LLC, Defendants. _____________________________/ C.B. CONTRACTORS, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. DUFFIELD ALUMINUM d/b/a DHI ROOFING, a Florida corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants. ____________________________ / ORDER Pending before the Court is the Stipulation To Vacate Default filed by Speed Framing, Inc. (“Speed Framing”). (Doc. 250.) Speed Framing is a Fourth Party Defendant in the Fourth Party Complaint filed on February 3, 2011 by Lowry Construction & Framing, Inc. (“Lowry”). (Docs. 146, 147, & 148.) On April 5, 2011, upon Lowry’s motion, the Clerk entered a Clerk’s default against Speed Framing. (Doc. 218.) Speed Framing requests that the Court set aside the default against it and advises that Lowry stipulates and consents to the setting aside of the default. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that: 1. Speed Framing, Inc.’s Stipulation To Vacate Default (Doc. 250) is GRANTED. 2. The clerk’s default entered against Speed Framing on April 5, 2011 (Doc. 218) is SET ASIDE. 3. Speed Framing shall respond to Lowry’s Fourth Party Complaint on or before June 3, 2011. DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2011. s/ Gary R. Jones GARY R. JONES United States Magistrate Judge Case No: 1:09-cv-254-SPM-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?