BARTRAM LLC v. C B CONTRACTORS LLC

Filing 276

ORDER granting 219 Motion for Clarification of 214 Order by Plaintiff. Court clarifies that the Order on Cross Motions for Partial Summary Judgment is limited to the breach of contract claims. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 6/22/2011. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION THE BARTRAM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 1:09-cv-00254-SPM/GRJ C.B. CONTRACTORS, LLC, and CAMBRIDGE BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, LLC., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION THIS CAUSE comes before this Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification on Order on Cross Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 214) and the response in opposition filed by Defendants, C.B. Contractors, LLC and Cambridge Builder & Contractors, LLC. Docs. 219 and 227. Plaintiff seeks a clarification because the order could mistakenly be read as extending the contractual waiver of consequential damages to its negligence claim against Cambridge Builders & Contractors, LLC. The Court’s ruling on the cross motions for summary judgment focused on the waiver of consequential damages as it relates to the breach of contract claims. Whether or not Plaintiff can maintain an action for negligence and the Page 2 of 2 impact the contractual waiver has on such a claim was not argued by the parties and not decided by the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for clarification (doc. 219) is granted. 2. The Court clarifies that the Order on Cross Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 214) is limited to the breach of contract claims. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of June, 2011. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle Chief United States District Judge CASE NO.: 1:09-cv-00254-SPM/GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?