BARTRAM LLC v. C B CONTRACTORS LLC

Filing 89

ORDER GRANTING 81 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 60 MOTION to Dismiss Count XVI of Third-Party Complaint filed by CB CONTRACTORS LLC, response due by 8/16/2010; GRANTING 82 First MOTION for E xtension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by BARTRAM LLC, response due by 8/23/2010. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 8/16/2010)., Miscellaneous Deadline - by 8/23/2010.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 8/11/2010. (jws)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION THE BARTRAM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. C.B. CONTRACTORS, LLC, Defendant. _______________________________/ C.B. CONTRACTORS, LLC, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. DUFFIELD ALUMINUM d/b/a DHI ROOFING, a Florida corporation; FLORIDA STATE PLASTERING, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; LOWRY CONSTRUCTION & FRAMING, INC., a Florida corporation; DAI-COLE WATERPROOFING COMPANY, INC., a Georgia corporation; FLOOR CRETE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Texas corporation; RIDGWAY ROOF TRUSS CO., a Florida corporation Third-Party Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Upon consideration, the unopposed motions for extension of time (docs. CASE NO.: 1:09-cv254-SPM/AK Paage 2 of 2 81 and 82) are granted. C.B. Contractors, LLC, shall have up to and including August 16, 2010, to file a response to Dia-Cole Waterproofing Comanty, Inc's Motion to Dismiss Count XVI of the Third-Party Complaint. The Bartram, LLC, shall have up to and including August 23, 2010, to respond to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2010. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle Chief United States District Judge CASE NO.: 1:09-cv254-SPM/AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?