THE BARTRAM LLC v. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al

Filing 161

ORDER granting 159 First MOTION for Leave to File 156 Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Notice of Potential Trial Conflict filed by LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, and granting 157 MOTION to Extend Time filed by LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ( Miscellaneous Deadline (Plaintiffs response to the Notice of Trial Conflict and Request for Protection) - due by 12/13/2011., (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response (file objections to Rule 26(a)(3) exhibits) due by 1/6/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 12/6/11. (bkp)

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
THE BARTRAM, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-28-SPM-GRJ

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation,
ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANY,
an Arizona corporation, and
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Georgia corporation
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Unopposed Motion For
Enlargement of Time To File Trial Exhibit List (Doc. 157) and Defendants’ Motion For
Leave To File A Reply To Plaintiff’s Response To Defendants’ Notice of Potential Trial
Conflict. (Doc. 159.)
In their motion for enlargement of time the Defendants request permission to file
their trial exhibit list on or before December 14, 2011. The most recent scheduling
order in this case did not specify a deadline for the parties to exchange their Rule
26(a)(3) exhibit lists. (Doc. 70.) The scheduling order in the related Contractor Action,
however, specified a November 30, 2011 deadline for the parties in the Contractor
Action to exchange their Rule 26(a)(3) exhibit lists. (1:09-cv-254 Doc. 130.) Plaintiff
does not oppose the request. Accordingly, Defendants’ request for an extension of time
to exchange their Rule 26(a)(3) exhibits lists is due to be granted. The deadline to
exchange Rule 26(a)(3) exhibit lists is December 14, 2011 and the deadline to file

Page 2 of 2

objections to the opposing party’s Rule 26(a)(3) exhibits is January 6, 2012.
Defendants also request permission to file a reply to Plaintiff’s Response (Doc.
156) to Defendants’ Notice of Potential Trial Conflict and Request For Protection. (Doc.
154.) While Plaintiff objects to Defendants’ request to file a reply, the Court determines
that a reply should be permitted.
Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:
1.

Defendants’ Unopposed Motion For Enlargement of Time To File Trial
Exhibit List (Doc. 157) is GRANTED. The parties shall exchange their
Rule 26(a)(3) exhibit lists on or before December 14, 2011. The deadline
to file objections to Rule 26(a)(3) exhibits is January 6, 2012.

2.

Defendants’ Motion For Leave To File A Reply To Plaintiff’s Response To
Defendants’ Notice of Potential Trial Conflict (Doc. 159) is GRANTED.
Counsel for Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiff’s response to the
Notice of Trial Conflict and Request for Protection on or before December
13, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of December, 2011.

s/ Gary R. Jones
GARY R. JONES
United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-28-SPM -GRJ