BEBOUT v. WOODY, et al

Filing 9

ORDER re 8 Amended Complaint filed by KENNETH GREGORY BEBOUT. Plaintiff shall have until 7/20/2010 to provide the Court with one (1) identical copy of the amended complaint for service on the Defendant. (Service Copy Deadline - by 9/20/2010.). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 9/8/2010. (jws)

Download PDF
-AK BEBOUT v. WOODY, et al Doc. 9 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KENNETH GREGORY BEBOUT, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WOODY, Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 8). The pleading has been reviewed as is required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and is deemed sufficient to alert Defendant to the nature and basis of Plaintiff's claims. It cannot be said upon this review of the amended complaint that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Thus, service of the amended complaint should be directed. At this point, Plaintiff must submit a service copy of the amended complaint. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), a copy of the amended complaint for each named Defendant is necessary to effect service and must be submitted by Plaintiff. As Plaintiff has named one (1) Defendant in this action, Plaintiff must provide the Court with one copy of the amended complaint that is identical to the amended complaint, doc. 8, filed with the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:: 1. Plaintiff shall have until September 20, 2010, to provide the Court with one (1) identical copy of his amended complaint for service on the Defendant. 2. Failure to submit the service copies as directed may result in the dismissal of this CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK Dockets.Justia.com Page 2 of 2 action. DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2010 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge s/Maurice M. Paul Case No: 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?