MEADOWS v. CITY OF INGLIS et al
ORDER re 75 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 73 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count V filed by JEAN M MEADOWS is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant's motion for partial summary judgment no later than 10 days after service of interrogatory responses by CITY OF INGLIS. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 3/7/2012. (jws)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JEAN M MEADOWS,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00045-MP-GRJ
CITY OF INGLIS,
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 75).
Defendant’s motion concerns issues of vicarious liability of the City which turns in part
on the facts and circumstances of the case. The plaintiff is awaiting responses to her
interrogatories from the City, which include inquiries into policies, supervision, and
training. The plaintiff needs the opportunity to review the City’s written responses in
order to properly respond to the motion for summary judgment. The defendants have
no objection to extending the deadline to respond to ten (10) days after service of
interrogatory responses by the City of Inglis.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to
defendant’s motion for summary judgment, doc. 75, is GRANTED.
Page 2 of 2
Plaintiff shall respond to defendant’s motion of partial summary judgment
no later than ten (10) days after service of interrogatory responses by the
City of Inglis.
DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2012.
áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá
GARY R. JONES
United States Magistrate Judge
Case No: 1:11-cv-00045-MP-GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?