MEADOWS v. CITY OF INGLIS et al

Filing 76

ORDER re 75 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 73 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count V filed by JEAN M MEADOWS is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant's motion for partial summary judgment no later than 10 days after service of interrogatory responses by CITY OF INGLIS. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 3/7/2012. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION JEAN M MEADOWS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00045-MP-GRJ CITY OF INGLIS, TIMOTHY LETSON, BRANDON ROBERTS, Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 75). Defendant’s motion concerns issues of vicarious liability of the City which turns in part on the facts and circumstances of the case. The plaintiff is awaiting responses to her interrogatories from the City, which include inquiries into policies, supervision, and training. The plaintiff needs the opportunity to review the City’s written responses in order to properly respond to the motion for summary judgment. The defendants have no objection to extending the deadline to respond to ten (10) days after service of interrogatory responses by the City of Inglis. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, doc. 75, is GRANTED. Page 2 of 2 2. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant’s motion of partial summary judgment no later than ten (10) days after service of interrogatory responses by the City of Inglis. DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2012. áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá GARY R. JONES United States Magistrate Judge Case No: 1:11-cv-00045-MP-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?