COPEMANN v. BRIEL et al
Filing
5
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation - 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Case is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 6/8/2011. (jws)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
DALE ALONZO COPEMANN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ
NANCY BRIEL, LESLIE GARRISON
SHERYLLE BUEHLER, GABE
HAMLETTE, and PAM JOHNSON,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation dated May 6, 2011 (doc. 4). Plaintiff has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and
recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 4) is
ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) is denied.
3.
This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2011.
s/ Stephan P. Mickle
Stephan P. Mickle
Chief United States District Judge
CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?