COPEMANN v. BRIEL et al

Filing 5

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation - 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Case is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 6/8/2011. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION DALE ALONZO COPEMANN, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ NANCY BRIEL, LESLIE GARRISON SHERYLLE BUEHLER, GABE HAMLETTE, and PAM JOHNSON, Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation dated May 6, 2011 (doc. 4). Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 4) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. Page 2 of 2 2. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) is denied. 3. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2011. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle Chief United States District Judge CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?