SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al

Filing 25

ORDER: 18 Motion to Introduce Florida Supreme Court and 1st District Court of Appeals Docket Sheets is GRANTED to the limited extent that the Court, if necessary, will consider the matters raised in the motion in ruling upon Petitioners 4 First Amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 6/26/2012. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION TED SMITH, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-265-MP-GRJ WILLIAM S. BAXTER, NFETC Administrator, and FRANK E. SHEFFIELD, Circuit Judge, Gadsden County, Respondents. _____________________________/ ORDER Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion To Introduce Florida Supreme Court and 1st District Court of Appeals Docket Sheets. (Doc. 18.) Petitioner seeks to introduce the docket sheets from his state court appeals. Petitioner’s motion fails to request specific relief from the Court. Rather, the motion simply attempts to bring to the attention of the Court matters that have occurred during the course of state proceedings. To this extent these matters are relevant to the Court’s determination of Plaintiff’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the motion is granted to the extent the Court will take note of these matters if necessary in ruling upon Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion To Introduce Florida Supreme Court and 1st District Court of Appeals Docket Sheets (Doc. 18) is GRANTED to the limited extent that the Court, if necessary, will consider the matters raised in the motion in ruling upon Petitioner’s Page 2 of 2 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of June 2012. s/ Gary R. Jones s/GaryR.Jone GARY R. JONES United States Magistrate Judge Case No: 1:11-cv-265-MP-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?