SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al

Filing 36

ORDER denying Doc. 35 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/24/2013. (jws)(Forwarded to USCA, 13-10262-D via email.)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION TED SMITH, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00265-MP-GRJ STATE OF FLORIDA, and PAM BONDI, Florida Attorney General, Respondents. _____________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability, construed from his notice of appeal. (Doc. 35). On January 15, 2013, petitioner filed a notice of interlocutory appeal of the Court’s January 8, 2013 order (doc. 30) affirming the magistrate judge’s December 28, 2012 order (doc. 28) denying petitioner’s “Motion to Vacate Void/ Judgment/ Order and Release Petitioner According to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 60(b)(4)” (doc. 27). An appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless the Court issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1). The Court may issue a certificate of appealability only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). For the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s order (doc. 28) and the Court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order (doc. 30), the Court finds that petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability (doc. 35) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of January, 2013 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 1:11-cv-00265-MP-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?