SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
Filing
52
ORDER adopting 48 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/20/2015. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 4 ), is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts. (kdm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
TED SMITH,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00265-MP-GRJ
WILLIAM S. BAXTER,
and FRANK E. SHEFFIELD,
Respondents.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated February 6, 2015, which recommends that both the petition for writ of
habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 4) and a certificate of appealability be
denied. (Doc. 48). Petitioner has not objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so
has passed. Petitioner’s copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable
from the North Florida Evaluation and Treatment Center in Gainesville, Florida. (Doc. 49). It
was also returned as undeliverable after it was sent to Petitioner at the North East Florida State
Hospital, 7487 State Road 121 South, MacClenny, FL 32063. (Doc. 51). Finding no plain error,
it is accordingly,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 48) is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 4),
is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2
3.
A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.
DONE AND ORDERED this
20th day of March, 2015
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case No: 1:11-cv-00265-MP-GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?