STEPHENS v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA et al

Filing 26

***VACATED PER 29 ORDER*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 5/29/13. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/26/2013. (bkp) Modified on 5/30/2013 (jws).

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION CYRIL MARCUS STEPHENS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:12-cv-94-MP-GRJ UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, Defendant. _____________________________/ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, was directed to file a Second Amended Complaint by April 8, 2013. (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff requested an extension of time, Doc. 23, which was granted. (Doc. 24.) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint was due on May 8, 2013. On May 10, 2013, the Court entered an order directing Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. (Doc. 25.) Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. As of the date of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the show cause order, has failed to file an amended complaint and otherwise has not filed any papers in this case since April 8, 2013. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute. IN CHAMBERS, at Gainesville, Florida, this 29th day of May 2013. s/Gary R. Jones GARY R. JONES United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 of 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES A party may file specific, w ritten objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after being served w ith a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections w ithin 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?