LANGILLE v. HOFER
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Government's 6 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's 11 , 16 Motions to Amend are DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/13/2013. (jws)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
DEANNA LANGILLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00127-MP-GRJ
JAY HOFER, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated January 14, 2013. (Doc. 15). The parties have been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has
passed, and none have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely
filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
2.
The government’s motion to dismiss (doc. 6) is GRANTED and this case is
DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.
3.
Plaintiff’s motions for leave to amend (docs. 11 and 16) are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this
13th day of February, 2013
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?