LANGILLE v. HOFER
Filing
23
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration, denying 22 MOTION to Amend Response to Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint by DEANNA LANGILLE. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/21/2013. (jws)
<![CDATA[
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
DEANNA LANGILLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00127-MP-GRJ
JAY HOFER, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider and Review Order.
(Doc. 21). Nothing in the current motion supports reconsideration of the conclusion that this
case should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.
Plaintiff’s motion presents no new facts, arguments, or evidence.
Accordingly it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider and review order (doc. 21) is DENIED.
2.
Plaintiff’s motion to amend response to motion to dismiss and motion for leave to
amend complaint (doc. 22) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this
21st day of February, 2013
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
