ROMANO v. KARDASHIAN et al
Filing
5
ORDER adopting #4 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 7/19/2012. This case is dismissed as frivolous. All further papers received from Gino Romano shall be referred to the Magistrate Judge for review before filing, in accordance with the order issued in Riches v. Nordegren, 1:10cv19, doc. 4. The clerk shall close this case. The Court retains jurisdiction to conduct further proceedings for the imposition of sanctions upon Plaintiff as may be recommended by the magistrate judge. (kdm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
GINO ROMANO,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:12cv132-SPM/GRJ
KIMBERLY KARDASHIAN, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation dated June 19, 2012 (doc. 4). Plaintiff has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and
recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 4) is
ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
This case is dismissed as frivolous.
Page 2 of 2
3.
All further papers received from “Gino Romano” shall be referred to
the Magistrate Judge for review before filing, in accordance with the order issued
in Riches v. Nordegren, 1:10cv19, doc. 4.
4.
The clerk shall close this case. The Court retains jurisdiction to
conduct further proceedings for the imposition of sanctions upon Plaintiff as may
be recommended by the magistrate judge.
DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2012.
s/ Stephan P. Mickle
Stephan P. Mickle
Senior United States District Judge
CASE NO. 1:12cv132-SPM/GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?