THOMAS v. COLVIN

Filing 22

ORDER AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY FEES: Plaintiff's Consent Petition for Attorney Fees, doc. 20 , is GRANTED and Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,886.61 as a reasonable EAJA attorney fee. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 12/24/13. (amm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION LUCINDA THOMAS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 1:13cv2-CAS CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY FEES Plaintiff filed a Consent Petition for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. ยง 2412(d), requesting an award of attorney fees in the amount of $3,886.61. Doc. 20. Defendant has filed a response and does not oppose the petition. Doc. 21. In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2524 (2010), the EAJA fee should be made payable to Plaintiff, not to Plaintiff's attorney. Since the fee was assigned to Plaintiff's attorney, Defendant has no objection to payment of the fee to Plaintiff's attorney so long as Plaintiff has no debt to the United States, and will offset any such debt before payment. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Consent Petition for Attorney Fees, docs. 20, is GRANTED and Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,886.61 as a reasonable EAJA attorney fee. However, the Commissioner may offset from this amount any debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States that may be identified by the Department of Treasury and any ultimate distribution shall be made in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff. DONE AND ORDERED on December 24, 2013. S/ Charles A. Stampelos CHARLES A. STAMPELOS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUD Case No. 1:13cv2-CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?