MULBERRY v. COLVIN
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff's application for Social Security benefits is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's 14 request for oral argument is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/6/2014. (jws)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
ANGELA L MULBERRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00094-MP-CAS
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated December 20, 2013. (Doc. 13). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo
determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely
filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. The ALJ’s
reasons for giving little weight to the opinion of Dr. Santiago are clearly articulated and
supported by substantial evidence, as fully explained by the Magistrate Judge on pages 18
through 21 of the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
The decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s application for Social
Security benefits is AFFIRMED.
3.
Plaintiff’s request for oral argument (doc. 14) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this
6th day of March, 2014
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case No: 1:13-cv-00094-MP-CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?