GADDY v. SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Filing
19
ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 10/29/2015. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Doc. 1 , is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. (kdm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
ISSAC L GADDY,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00158-MP-GRJ
SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated August 12, 2015. (Doc. 17). The parties have been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Petitioner has filed objections at
Doc. 18. I have made a de novo review based on those objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I
have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. The Court agrees
with the Magistrate Judge that counsel was not deficient for failing to call the girlfriend to
testify. The record shows that defense counsel stated in open court, with the defendant present,
that the defendant had been consulted and agreed that they would not call the girlfriend as a
witness. This was a reasonable tactical decision as the girlfriend was the victim of the original
attack that led to the police contact. Second, petitioner argues that the State did not prove all the
elements of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer because, in his view, the State failed
to introduce evidence that he intentionally and unlawfully threatened by word or act to do
Page 2 of 2
violence towards the law enforcement officer. This claim was not raised on direct appeal and
should have been, so it is procedurally barred. Also, if intended to be brought as a claim of
ineffective assistance, it also fails. The officer testified that petitioner stepped towards him with
a knife while saying, "Come on." A rational jury could find that this showed an intentional
threat to do harm, and any objection or motion by counsel would not have succeeded. Finally,
the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge and state 3.850 judge that neither Giglio or Brady
would apply to the recording of the victim’s call to police. Also, the recording is excepted from
Florida’s hearsay rule as a spontaneous statement, excited utterance and then a record of a
regularly conducted activity. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
2.
The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Doc. 1, is
DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this
29th day of October, 2015
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case No: 1:13-cv-00158-MP-GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?