ARANGO v. ROBINSON et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and dismissing case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with an order of the Court; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/25/14. (tss)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
MAXIMO RAMOS ARANGO,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00058-MP-GRJ
WILLIAMS ROBINSON, et al.
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated October 17, 2014. (Doc. 11). The parties have been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has
passed, and none have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report
and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
2.
This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b) for failure to comply with an order of the Court. The dismissal qualifies as a
strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
DONE AND ORDERED this
25th day of November, 2014
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?