DORNES v. COLVIN

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING THE 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The plaintiff's request for oral argument (doc. 16 ) is DENIED. The Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff's application for di sability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is AFFIRMED. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this action is DISMISSED." Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 8/31/2015. (tdl)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KIMBERLY S. DORNES, Plaintiff, v. 1:14cv114–WS–GRJ CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed July 15, 2015. See Doc. 15. The magistrate judge recommends that the Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income be affirmed. The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 16) to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Page 2 of 2 The court having considered the record in light of the plaintiff’s objections, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 15) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. 2. The plaintiff’s request for oral argument (doc. 16) is DENIED. 3. The Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is AFFIRMED. 4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this action is DISMISSED." DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of August , 2015. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 1:14cv114–WS–GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?