CLARK v. CERVONE et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) because Plaintiff has failed to state a valid claim for relief and seeks relief against defendants who are immune from suit. Further, all pending motions should be terminated, and this case should count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/20/2014. (jws)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
DARREN N CLARK, SR,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00176-MP-GRJ

WILLIAM P CERVONE, RALPH D GRABEL,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated September 23, 2014. (Doc. 5). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has
passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.

2.

This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) because Plaintiff has failed to state a valid claim for
relief and seeks relief against defendants who are immune from suit. Further, all
pending motions should be terminated, and this case should count as a strike
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2014

s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge