TRUSSELL v. SIEGMEISTER et al
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 6 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED pursuant to the Younger v. Harris abstention doctrine, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 5/1/2015. (jws)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
TERRY GEORGE TRUSSELL,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00195-MP-GRJ
JEFFREY A. SIEGMEISTER, et al.,
Respondents.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated March 30, 2015. (Doc. 7). The Petitioner has been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has
passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 7) is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
The First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 6), is DISMISSED pursuant to the Younger v. Harris
abstention doctrine, 401 U.S. 37 (1971).
DONE AND ORDERED this
1st day of May, 2015
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?