MATHIS v. JONES
Filing
38
ORDER adopting 36 Report and Recommendation. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 11/22/2017. The Clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: "The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 13 , challengi ng petitioners judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Willie Norman Mathis, Alachua County Circuit Court Case No. 10-CF-3408, is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is denied." The Clerk is directed to close the file. (kdm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
WILLIE N MATHIS,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00130-WTH-CJK
JULIE L JONES,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated June 19, 2017, ECF No. 36. The parties have been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Petitioner has filed objections at
ECF No. 37. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the
Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report
and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
2.
The Clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: “The Amended Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 13, challenging petitioner’s judgment of
conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Willie Norman Mathis, Alachua
Page 2 of 2
County Circuit Court Case No. 10-CF-3408, is DENIED. A certificate of
appealability is denied.”
3.
The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2017
Case No: 1:15-cv-00130-WTH-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?