PAYLAN v. TEITELBAUM et al

Filing 205

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Dr. Teitelbaum's Memorandum in Support of His Bill of Costs and Motion for Court to Determine Entitlement to Attorneys' Fees or Ot her Sanctions, ECF No. 192 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant is entitled to a reduced amount of taxable costs, but Defendant is not entitled to attorneys' fees or other sanctions. The Clerk must reduce the taxable costs by $9,166.12 and enter judgment for costs in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff in the total sum of $9,937.83." Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/24/2018. (atm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15cv159-MW/GRJ SCOTT TEITELBAUM, M.D., Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 201, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 204. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Dr. Teitelbaum’s Memorandum in Support of His Bill of Costs and Motion for Court to Determine Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees or Other Sanctions, ECF No. 192, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant is entitled to a reduced amount of taxable costs, but Defendant is not entitled to attorneys’ fees or other sanctions. The Clerk must reduce the taxable costs by $9,166.12 and enter judgment 1 for costs in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff in the total sum of $9,937.83.” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on October 24, 2018. s/ MARK E. WALKER Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?