WRIGHT v. MARTIN et al
ORDER adopting 91 Report and Recommendation; granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 96 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 4/13/2017. The clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: "Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 54 , is GRANTED." (kdm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
WALTER LEE WRIGHT,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00189-WTH-GRJ
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated February 13, 2017. (Doc. 91). The parties have been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff was
granted an extension of time to file objections, Doc. 93, but Plaintiff failed to file any
objections. Instead, Plaintiff filed a second motion to extend, which the Court has
considered, without a hearing, and finds that the motion is due to be denied.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Doc. 91, is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension, Doc. 96, is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2
The clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: “Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment, Doc. 54, is GRANTED.”
The clerk is directed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 13th day of April, 2017.
Case No: 1:15‐cv‐00189‐WTH‐GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?