DYALS, SR v. BERRYHILL
ORDER adopting 19 Report and Recommendation; denying 20 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to File Objections to Report & Recommendation. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 4/13/2017. The clerk is directed to enter judgment stating: "The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED." The clerk is directed to close the file. (kdm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
DAVID ALTON DYALS, SR,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00013-WTH-GRJ
NANCY A BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated March 3, 2017. (Doc. 19). The parties have been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed
objections at Doc. 21. I have made a de novo review based on those objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I
have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Furthermore, the Court notes that Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file objections
to the Report and Recommendation. As Plaintiff filed the objections the same day as
the motion, the motion is now moot.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Page 2 of 2
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Doc. 19, is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
The clerk is directed to enter judgment stating: “The decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.”
Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to File Objections, Doc. 20, is DENIED
The clerk is directed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 13th day of April, 2017.
Case No: 1:16‐cv‐00013‐WTH‐GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?